Pacific Timesheet
Web-based payroll timesheet & project time tracking system
4,7 /5 (3 reviews) Write a Review!Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Features
- Industry: Education Management
- Company size: 501-1 000 Employees
- Used Weekly for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Overall rating
- Ease of Use
- Likelihood to recommend 9.0 /10
Simple, user-friendly timesheets
Reviewed on 2018/03/12
Pros
Pacific Timesheet is very easy to use as an employee submitting timesheets, requesting time off, and calculating remaining vacation time/sick time, etc.
Cons
A lot of the PTO balances are shown in hours, which is very useful for admin, but slightly less useful for a user thinking in terms of days rather than hours. Not a big deal but worth noting.
- Industry: Government Administration
- Company size: 11-50 Employees
- Used Daily for 1+ year
-
Review Source
Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Likelihood to recommend 8.0 /10
Pacific timesheet
Reviewed on 2019/10/23
Promotes organization. Traceability, ease of use,advance planning available, coordination with staff for vacations etc
Pros
AN ABILITY to edit. Keeps track of days, vacation, time off TIME IN, DOUBLE TIME. ETC, set for the year
Cons
Can not use externally to my knowledge
From. Mobile phone or from home.
Inability to use remotely from phone,home,laptop etc
- Industry: Political Organization
- Company size: 51-200 Employees
- Used Daily for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Likelihood to recommend 10.0 /10
So easy to use!
Reviewed on 2017/10/10
Pros
Switching from ADP, Pacific Timesheet has been nothing short of a god-send in terms of our employees completing their timesheets. It is more intuitive, straightforward, and completely uncluttered with extraneous info employees don't need. Most of all, our employees love that we can pre-load time coding in, so they choose what they worked on and how much time, and the system does the rest.
Cons
I love everything about it, but they could improve their website a bit. It's stuck in 2005 and could be updated to (1) look more modern, and (2) be mobile-friendly.
