ACCELQ Reviews

In the past, we had multiple teams - manual and automation working independently and trying to work with tight schedules and deadlines. There were delays in the manual to automation handoffs and then the cycle seemed to never end. accelQ proved to be a gamechanger for our test automation process. Software testing is not the same for us anymore. The time and effort required for software testing has greatly reduced, and we are able to see a considerable difference in our returns on investment as well. The In Sprint automation feature does the GUI and API automation, all in the same end-to-end-flow. Detection of errors, early reports, helps us fix errors before the production stage. We can build the application while simultaneously automating it.

There’s just one con...the initial investment. To be honest, we were a bit reluctant to go for this platform thinking about the cost being slightly on the higher side. However, after using the platform for more than a year now, when we look back at the journey, the investment we made was the best one. We saved on the overall effort, time, and our inception to implementation of software has drastically accelerated.

Cross-Browser & Cross-Device Testing
Ease of Test Case Creation
Intuitive Interface
Ease of Maintenance
AI-Powered Testing
No-Code Automation

Limited User Role Customization
Mobile Testing Limitations
Limited Customization for Complex Scenarios

During the initial days, our team faced some challenges in understanding things, primarily because we transitioned from a fully coded environment to a no-code/low-code approach. At that time, we greatly needed support, and the Customer Success team provided valuable guidance through healthy discussions on various points.

The platform is simple and crisp to use. When I use Salesforce in my projects, its quarterly releases from Salesforce's end make managing XPath-related issues much easier.

Unlike traditional record-and-play concepts, Salesforce stands out with its auto-update feature. Additionally, the official user guide provided after obtaining the license offers top-notch content, and updates related to internal releases are quickly notified.

As of now, to be very honest, I would say no. The reason I’m saying this is because AccelQ has solved so many of our problems related to automation in Salesforce-based projects.

Low code automation with minimal setup,ai powered test design.

limited customizations,premium pricing,limited community support and learning advanced features

Codeless Automation.
AI-Powered Test Automation.
End-to-End Testing.

Limited Customization.
Debugging Complexity.

Self Healing Capability for the elements.
Application Universe.
Support for Requirements and Defect Integration
Email notifications to stake holders upon completion of the jobs
Support for API, Database testing
Desktop Automation (Oracle Ebusiness suite and SAP)

Desktop Application Testing - AccelQ currently supports this but there can be a support for few Legacy applciations

Best thing about the tool is you can do automation with no complex coding involved. It has lot of re-usable functions and statement which perfectly suits automation of various platform, in my case it was Salesforce.
Our Functional testers find it very easy to upskill themselves with this tool and contribute to automation effectively.
In-Sprint automation can very well be achieved by this tool. we were able to reduce the time and efforts in software testing by making the manual and automation testing teams as one.

Nothing as of today. Suits well for our needs

accelQs codeless automation is simplifying even the most complex test automation. We were apprehensive on the boxed approach for complex cases. It is working out well for us. Our automation productivity has improved, while manual test teams also started adopting automation more enthusiastically. Our test coverage improved with automatic test case generation the system provides. Also, handling one-off edge cases with windows controls and API calls is now part of the main test case automation flow for us.

In the last couple of years, we haven’t experienced any major issues with accelQ. Our wish-list keeps growing with advanced use cases we are building. But their delivery schedule and releases are also pretty aggressive.

Just how easy it is top build once you actually know what you are doing. How based on your knowledge gather more information to enforce upon other scripts

Nothing, I really wish I knew the API|Manual scripts better, learning as much as I can

1. Command explorer - Suggests and helps you find almost all commands/functions that you would want to use in your test automation
2. NLP feature of the Action editor- NLP is powerful and able to suggest appropriate functions accurately
3. Universe - Mapping of all your flows, steps, and actions in a pictorial representation for easy readability and understanding in a blink
4. Results - Exhaustive analysis of what failed, at which point with necessary screenshots gives a bird eye view perspective for the user to debug quickly

1. There can be a way to customize functions in the action editor, such that the functions can be tweaked according to the test case needs
2. There is little lag in live sync of changes made across flows, steps, actions, etc