Make Reviews

They have many native connections as well as the option to connect via API which makes the use cases unlimited
The freemium is also great

Some of the connections don't work properly, maintenance could be better
The migration from Integromat was also a bit frustrating

No-code are great when it is easy to start with them but you can learn and grow with them without hitting a ceiling too early. Make fulfills this.

To be honest, nothing really comes to mind right now.

Easy to create your flows, connect the different apps and handle errors.

Support has been slow in replying when something is not working or I'm not really sure if I'm doing it correctly.

Multiple paths and error handling are better than in Zapier. Good value plans with generous free tier.

UX can the confusing at times. It’s frustrating there isn’t a custom code action readily available.

Love the ability to route multiple inputs to multiple outputs. Has a very intuitive visual flow which I wish more products would adopt.

Billing, apples to apples more expensive than other products in the space. Charges for all operations.Custom code not well documented. Even the most basic things take some research.Navigation not exactly great with data tables being located in the main menu and you'd want to have them in flows. Also seems very stingy with storage allocations.

The visual interface of Make is a joy to use. The educational course content is very comprehensive and makes it easy to get up and running and learn, not just how Make works, but how applications communicate in general. So even if you're a complete novice but have a desire to learn a new skill, it's very valuable.
Support is excellent and the Make community will always support you if you have trouble with building particular scenarios.

If I had to pick a flaw, while the educational content is very good, there are "continuation" errors (I assume due to updates in the course content which is not back-checked and edited, or due to updates to the platform, so an image you see may not be the same as in the course). This can confuse beginners and did confuse me at the start. But it is improving.

Make is great when you want to automate stuff between various platforms and there are no native integrations. After watching a few videos of people using it, it became easy to jump right into it and create scenarios.
Even if a tool has no integration with Make, using the API is fairly easy.

Since Make charges per operation, it can become somewhat expensive, but besides that nothing comes to mind.

The product can connect any types of awsome tools together through API. You can do whatever you want to do if you have knowledges about API.

Without knowledge about API, tools, network...etc, it is quite tough to use. And, moreover, it is less support for Japanese users to use this. There are similar products which is locailized in Japan.

Make is easy to understand and use for basic tasks; you need to invest some time on the (very good) training to exploit the ore advanced features and create complex workflows, but yuu'll find yourself doing magic.

Some features and connections are missing, bu tit's only a matter of time, they'll be integrated for sure.

The visualization is amazing. It is also easy to set up when there are conditional workflows

learning curve. it took a couple of days to learn.

Make is one of the most flexible SAAS products on the market. Its interface is more intuitive to me than Zapier. I love the workflow diagram structure. It works with a huge number of different apps. When I started using it, I needed Zapier to fill in some of the gaps where Make could not complete the needed integration (at least natively). Since that time, Make has added nearly all of my required integrations. It also has the flexibility to work with the API directly.

Support takes a really long time to get back to you. Often times the response leaves something to be desired. Other times, the response is great (though slow).

The transition from Integromat to Make was not handled very well. There are tonnes of complaints about problems caused as a result of the transition. Some of the complaints are warranted, others are overblown in my opinion.

Would love the ability to run an automation again when things go wrong. This is currently missing (there may be a complex solution that I'm not aware of).

I like the cost, the features, the hundreds of apps. And the helpline available. Did I mention the cost?

There are some things you will learn through trial and error that are not in the tutorials. (e.g. having to erase the error line in a spreadsheet to continue the scenario). There is a slight learning curve with the names of their things (especially if coming from another company) e.g. scenarios. Also there should be a clearer learning path for making multiple workflows.

Make is very versatile - You can adjust countless settings to match your business case. Also, it is significantly cheaper than Zapier.

The amount of integrated apps is way less than on Zapier. Alltough I prefer using Make whenever I can, sometimes I have to come back to Zapier because of the missing app integration.

It can be used easily. There are many tutorials to learn through. It would have an intuitive interface.

I don't know if I have anything to complain about.

It is easy to use. The visual user interface is awesome.

Bit limited in terms of data management options

Better price, good amount of tools and good data inside each call of tool.

The user experience is not the Best, and the dashboard is a little weak.

Allows me to bring products to market in record time, helps me iterate and try different solutions

Having to switch from Integromat to Make, took effort as I had many integrations

The interface and use without compromising capabilities.

the per operation economic model. it feels that not all operations should not be made equal.