Red Hat Process Automation Manager
Business process automation system for project teams
4 /5 (2 reviews) Write a Review!Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Features
- Industry: Education Management
- Company size: 11-50 Employees
- Used Weekly for 1-5 months
-
Review Source
Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Likelihood to recommend 7.0 /10
Great product. Cost effective Solution.
Reviewed on 2017/10/06
Real-time dashboards to monitor key performance stats help to optimize processes.
Pros
Cost; this is a relatively cost effective solution for managing and automating business workflows and processes.
Cons
Installations can be rough. But overall lot of features and tons of knowledge base and information available, including the user community. Also, it does not have all the bells and whistles that some of the other solutions offer.
- Company size: 11-50 Employees
- Used Other for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Overall rating
- Value for Money
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Likelihood to recommend 8.0 /10
I have developed and install BPM processes using JBoss BPM Suite for some customers...
Reviewed on 2018/06/25
Without a BPM product the client did not have a way to know the performance of their processes.
Now with a BPM product the client knows how much time a user takes to accomplish its job, which part of the process has a bottleneck and requires a tune, where to improve and do more with less work.
It provides a way for the client to manage its processes and to be more responsive in their business, to react faster to the environment needs.
Pros
The installation of JBoss BPM Suite is easy, it provides different ways to install and all are easy.
The tool to create and model the processes its great and provides different ways to integrate with other third party tools. As JBoss BPM Suite have been created based on BPMN 2.0 its easy to understand all notations for all types of activities, events, flows etc as is the same in other tools.
Also it provides different ways to manage and monitor the processes when interacting with the process user (The life cycle).
Cons
For some custom integrations with third party vendors or programs you have to develop, so it makes it a little difficult because there are not so much examples so you have to open a case with Red Hat support for help.
The way to keep many versions of your processes it's poor and it lacks of integration with many other programs for continues integration.
It would be great to have a tools to manage the processes in a Architecture perspective.
