--- description: Learn how BrowserStack can help your business. GetApp provides users in South Africa with the most detailed information on software tools, prices and features. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack Reviews, Prices & Ratings | GetApp South Africa 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Bug Tracking Software](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.za.com/software/170655/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale \& optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 774 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 774 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39,00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - A/B Testing - AI/Machine Learning - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Action-Word Testing - Activity Dashboard - Activity Monitoring - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Escalation - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Approval Workflow - Archiving & Retention - Assessment Management - Asset Discovery - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Related Categories - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Load Testing Software](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.za.com/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [UserQ](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/2066850/userq) — 4.3/5 (13 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (71 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/2061099/testomatio) — 4.7/5 (23 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A reliable option for browser testing" — 4.0/5 > **Miranda** | *21 April 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Very usable interface and generous free trial options (a range of different operating system options, etc.). > > **Cons**: The first time I tested (back in 2023), there was a bug that prevented me from seeing the website in real-time. Since then, I believe the product has become more reliable. ----- ### "Great Free Version With a lot More Option When Using Full Version" — 5.0/5 > **LEONARDO** | *03 April 2026* | Telecommunications | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Disclaimer: My team and I have only used the Test Management tool from Browserstack, so I am reviewing only this part. The thing I like the most is the limited free version of the software. Why? because it is really important to be able to check all the features the limited edition has to offer, so the team can evaluate the software and decide if this is the way to go or not. I really appreciate the functionalities that the limited version offers, as we (as a team) are slowly getting to a point where we would probably need more. And we can go to our management and sat "hey, look, we have used this, but now we would need more. We have 100 test scenarios, but the development could be much faster". > > **Cons**: When we started using the free version of the tool, we quickly realized that this will probably not be enough. We really miss the AI integration, at least limited one, with the free version, because this would speed up our process tremendously. It is not a "deal breaker", but it would be nice to have. > > I would say that it was 9/10. I am deducting one point because of the lack of AI in the free version (at least a limited version). Otherwise the tool is absolutely super. user management is great, test case creation is nice, also the management of already created cases is easy. We are a team of 4 people and everybody got used to it immediately and now we are using it on a daily basis. And don't forget the integaration with other Browserstack solutions. I have only reviewed the Test Management part, as this is the only one that we are currently using. i have used the test recording fetaure and it was a blast, so it is only a matter of time when we will use more Browserstack's features. ----- ### "General review of Browserstack products" — 4.0/5 > **Hemangshu** | *24 April 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Browserstack provides a wide range of testing products which have AI integrated in them. And integrating them is easy once you get the flow. > > **Cons**: Some of the product documentation are a bit confusing. Documentation should be easy to read. The product description could be better so users can easily understand what the product does. ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *01 April 2026* | Information Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Cons**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "Cost-to-Functionality Winner: BrowserStack is a Solid, Feature Rich, Testing Platfrom" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *02 April 2026* | Marketing & Advertising | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack's major strength is that they do exactly what they advertise. Their testing platform allows us to quickly test new functionality while at the same time, perform accurate and automated regression testing. Personally, my favorite feature is the visual compare feature where you can test your software with literally hundreds of platform and browser combinations and easily tell where your UI may have to be tweaked to provide a solid experience for your end-users. We evaluated many platforms prior to choosing BrowserStack and while some (not many) offered similar feature sets, the price of BrowserStack made it an absolute no-brainer. The value you get for your money is heads and tails above other similar systems. While there is a small learning curve, the software is generally very easy to use without the need to reach out to customer support for anything. > > **Cons**: Occasionally the speed of BrowserStack can be annoying. It's not anything that reaches the level of unusable or support worthy, it's just something that comes with using web-based SaaS. > > Overall, you can't beat the value-to-functionality of BrowserStack. It's a solid testing platform that is constantly adding new functionality and hardening existing features. I have no interest in shopping around for anything else in the testing arena because BrowserStack covers all the bases\! ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.za.com/software/170655/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data