Glider Reviews

Ease of use and customization. Good test library

Direct Bulk registration of candidates.

The platform gives- Candidates whom employers can engage, interview and upskill.- Omni channel for recruitment and after recruitment.- Data driven and custom built dashboards made easy for employers.

No Cons as such but more APIs from various job-searching platforms can make glider.ai pioneer in recruitment.

Covers lot of technical skills
Video recording of assessment
Output available to share with managers
Split of rating by sub-skills
Good at filtering out weak candidates

Too many (about 75%) candidates do well on the test and then get rejected in client interviews.

The ability to cross check identities and watch the assessment playbacks has proven incredibly useful. We have caught multiple bait and switch candidates, which would have been otherwise overlooked. By having this feature, we have saved our company quite a good amount of money. The overall program is very user friendly.

I feel that while this software is user friendly, there are multiple times we run into errors with certain question types we need or tools that cannot be implemented or added into our assessments, but they clearly have them listed as possible options to pick from...

All the features ranging from Assessments, Screening Bot as well as Screening helper tool, Interview tool. Ability to build and customize tests for IT as well as behavioral skills. The in-built artificial intelligence of the tool that captures every minute detail wherever there is any red flag. Proctoring capabilities, candidate search capabilities, integration with Job Diva which is our ATS as well as assessment ranking capabilities and the way Glider displays the report which is short but very useful.

If there can be a helper bot added for first time users which helps with navigation of the platform.

Finally an easy to use, and extremely valuable tech team, for support, and really responsive.

Finally an easy to use, and extremely valuable tech team, for support, and really responsive.

Some of the ideas that the company has about debugging a complex algorithm may be quite good.

But the test is broken. First the 3rd question enables people to actually put programming commands into the interpreter. However questions 1 and 2 do not.

Although starting with question 4, we are supposed to type into gliders make-shift "IDE" question 1 gives the user the impression that it is not about programming at all, but about reading someone else's complex lambda expression. Question 1 slaps the user on the wrist if they open a terminal window and try to type into it. It then shuts down. 10 points off.

Question 2 comes up. It has a set of illegal syntax that looks like this

1. "x = X();

Of course this is an illegal statement. Why wouldn't it be? No statement is going to start with a double quote. But yet the question expects someone to actually have an answer.

What was the point? In Question 1 we aren't allowed to program. In Question 2 we are given a program that makes no sense and then asked questions about it.

I skipped it. Then came question 3 which was a very short simple "Double jeapordy " style "do you know this" kind of question. Finally after 2 nonsense questions and a trivial pursuit THEN glider suddenly says "great... now get out your coding pencil and figure out how I glider messed up this tree algorithm."

Forget it.

It was designed by a software illiterate to ask programming questions and in one case A) not let the programmer run the code B) in another require that they DO run the code, and C) in a 3rd feed someone garbled nonsense.

Tool work flow is simple and neat.
Proctoring and candidate engagement scoring feature is very good.
Customer support team is awesome.

I feel for technical assessment reviewing user interface should improve little bit.
The employer branding section should get auto updated with company's real time updates.

Question Bank is what you can look at any time for any skills, they keep adding question and the AI make it sure that the questions are set according to the level set(Easy, medium and Hard). Simulator is one of the function to have. Wonderful support team they are approachable anytime for help. Of course the cost for using it doesn't burn your pocket.

The User interface need to be improved,for a first time user its might be difficult to use. Help section where we can refer what to do if stuck so that we don't contact support for each issue.

We use Glider as an assessment partner for US recruitment and we got a great success in hiring some customer service roles.

Not dislikes, but sometimes it become a little frustrating when due to some technical glitches the candidate is unable to access the assessment even after several tries.

Nice Assessments features. Easy way of sending assessments to consultants.

Little Costly. Cost factor is on the higher side when compared to alternate tools same like Glider

The workflows are seamless, features like stack ranking of candidates, technical assessment, ability to customize these and proctoring are all very useful. These features help TA focus on the best available talent filtering the clutter

Glider must invest more on brand building so that there is greater awareness in the IT talent community. Currently we sometimes face issues with candidates refusing to take up assessments on glider. Once there is more awareness there will be lesser resistance on taking up assessments.

Detects false employees - confirms the candidates knowledge

Not enough accurate assessments to review all roles

Interviews and assessments. Customer support and ready reckoner for feedbacka

Takes a little time to know the work flow

The ease of understanding assessment for consultants is very user friendly

Tool looks so congested sometimes. Lot of tests in one screen itself. They need work on their UI

The ability to create almost any kind of assessment imaginable. The platform has helped us to automate much of our manual assessment processes which saves us a lot of time.

The software can be a little tricky to learn how to use at first, but they are making it more user friendly all the time and are very responsive to feedback and new feature requests.

This product can help save time for so many during the hiring process. It's an accurate way to assess candidates prior to an interview and make sure they have the right skills needed for the job.

It is expensive, however you could look at your ROI and assess if it makes sense for your organization.

The tool is scalable. I have had over 400 candidates taking a test at a time without any glitch. It is robust and time saving. It automatically throws out the result section wise making manual intervention 0. It is time saving and reduces manual intervention saves effort of having tests at campus.

Only the creating the log in. Giving access to panels is the hard part. Once given it is self explanatory

This software is so easy to use and great for screening candidates! :)

None- This software is the best thing ever!

Easy to configure and invite candidates.

Nothing major that I can think of and dont want to nitpick

Its use of AI in sorting out the resumes in terms of recruitment,
Technical based assessments. Also, in terms of Interview conduction is also good.

while posting jobs, few things like salary range could be changed, glider font and color could be changed.