OmTrak

Pros

Easiness in use and user friendly.
Unique Assets schedule that can be build under parent child relationship.
Access to all concerned parties makes the documentation easy.
Very fast servers for accessing and retrieving data.

Cons

Personally all features and well kept benefiting one way or other.

Pros

I like the set up (easy to follow) and functional well,

Cons

you can't change when you make mistake, and have to contract WebFM people to unlock before make changes.

Pros

I don't consider Omtrak to have any advantages over the Aconex system that I have had more experience with

Cons

Some terminology (e.g. the use of the term 'manuals' in project design stages) is inconsistent with common industry practice in NZ.

The indexing/scheduling arrangement of correspondence is not very intuitive to me

Lacks document format options and features

I work on multiple projects, often with different management systems. It is challenging to effectively switch between them. I find Omtrak to be less intuitive than Aconex which I use more frequently.

Pros

The system works very quickly when uploading documents etc. The job set ups are simple and very easy to use.

Cons

Some items / descriptions in drop down boxes are not relevant to the project you are working on.

Pros

Structured and informative layout that provides the framework for our supply and trade partners on the project to upload the drawings, data sheets, maintenance requirements and capture the asset data. Review and reporting process is simple and managed allowing client visibility and review throughout the process.
Once captured and approved, the data can be presented in a soft copy O+M or ported across to the FM platform or other FM data system.

Cons

Once you have used the Omtrak platform on a number of projects, returning to a project with 'paper hard copy manuals' makes you wonder why you did not use the product.